 |
Опрос |
 |
|
|
GMAT/Critical Thinking
In his most recent speech, my opponent, Governor Smith, accused me of having
distorted the facts' misrepresenting his own position, suppressing information, and
deliberately lying to the people.
Which of the following possible responses by this speaker would be LEAST relevant to his dispute with Governor Smith?
A) Governor Smith would not have begun to smear me if he did not sense that his own campaign was in serious trouble.
B) Governor Smith apparently misunderstood my characterization of his position, so I will attempt to state more clearly my understanding of it.
C) At the time I made those remarks, certain key facts were not available, but new information uncovered by my staff does support the position I took at that time.
D) I can only wish Governor Smith had specified those points he considered to be lies so that I could have responded to them now.
E) With regard to the allegedly distorted facts, the source of my information is a Department of Transportation publication entitled "Safe Driving."
| ОТВЕТЫ И КОММЕНТАРИИ |
| Решение |
A) Governor Smith would not have begun to smear me if he did not sense that his own campaign was in serious trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prima 57
If x, y, and z are positive integers such that x < y < z, is x a factor of the
odd integer z?
(1) x and y are prime numbers, whose sum is a factor of 57
(2) z is a factor of 57
(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2)
alone is not.
(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1)
alone is not.
(C) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the
question, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question.
(E) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the
question.
|
|
Вверх 
